Wtf was that half baked movie!!! Why was there a blank screen between every shot!?! Whoever the editor was, u r fired. Goodbye!!! The best part was the less than one min of julia fox; the rest was just awkward dialogue and a bunch of disjointed uncomf scenes that made no sense. Reveals were made too early; the twist was easy to suspect; it felt that it was made purely to be shown on a cinematographer’s portfolio reel bc the first person shooting was the coolest part about it.
this movie was interesting, but overall sucked. almost no plots reach any conclusion, there's really uncomfortable "romance" between the child main character and a disabled adult, and it's way too long for what happens.
this might lose me some cool points but this movie genuinely pissed me off so much. i have never been so bored by a movie to the point that i began falling asleep until this movie.
i truly think this would've been fantastic as a 20ish minute long short film, but unfortunately it is just 100 minutes of you siting in silence and staring at a dimly lit corner with a noticeably looped grain filter plastered over it. the 5 minutes total in which something actually does happen are cool, but it still is the only film to receive a 0.5/5 stars on my letterboxed so far.
I actually watched this after hearing Red Letter Media talk about it on the same night that I watched Starry Eyes. It was thoroughly nonsensical and I wouldn’t be surprised if AI had written the entire thing. It’s not good or even really halfway decent but it made me laugh!
