🥧
this movie was really over hyped to me. hugh grant is great tho
recommendation image
Mar 31, 2025

Comments (10)

Make an account to reply.
image
the girls who get it get it
Mar 31, 2025
image
@CAPYBOPPY we’ll need to chat and see what i’m missing
Apr 1, 2025
image
I just watched this the other day! I will say I was on edge the whole time but definitely not scared. I had no thoughts or feelings about it afterwards. Will never watch again. Great acting tho!
Mar 31, 2025
image
@MOSSYELFIE I am pro Sinister Hugh Grant
Mar 31, 2025
image
got flashbacks to being trapped many a time by a man talking at me trying to make me feel stupid or love something less… he was too good at it
Mar 31, 2025
image
Good acting but it was soo boring
Mar 31, 2025
image
@LNDSY yeah 🙃 and not that scary
Mar 31, 2025
image
@LNDSY I wasn’t scared at all! And I wanted to be terrified!
Mar 31, 2025
image
Was so disappointed and now I can’t eat blueberry pie anymore. Hugh was everything.
Mar 31, 2025
image
@SALAD_VALET great cast that was entertaining to watch, but I was expecting more depth with the themes and didn’t get it.
Mar 31, 2025

Related Recs

recommendation image
⚖️
I enjoyed watching this so much I stayed up way too late to finish it
Jan 1, 2025
📽
watched the 70mm showing an hour away from home felt unsafe on a subway, got home at 4am and it was so worth it the movie is unbelievably good, and is like a rain on 2024 movie drought
🦇
honestly one of those rare movies that fully lives up to the hype. robert eggers has no misses yet. what a run. this movie is so good i feel compelled to write an essay about it. anyway pls go and watch it asap.
Jan 1, 2025

Top Recs from @lucius

recommendation image
✍️
Alright y'all, standards have gotten a little lax around here and rec quality has taken a dip (I'm including myself in this). Here are some pointers for High Rec Standards. ANATOMY OF A REC: TITLE—This is the rec or recommendations. This is NOT a lead in. Type exactly what you're recommending here. What appears in the Title should finish this sentence, "I recommend _____." BODY—This supports the rec and anything goes. Supporting statements, supporting essays, additional recs, you can get silly, you can pontificate. You can do anything you want. Except putting the main rec down here. Where does it go? That's right. In the Title 👆 IMAGE—No rules. Add one to preference. It can be relevant or a non sequitur. LINK—I highly recommend links but it's not as important as the Title or Body. If you are recommending something that has an online presence (music, movies, websites, products, etc.), Piffies want to click on it immediately. Don't make us google. Be kind a leave a link. EMOJI—No rules. Express yourself. ANTI-RECS: They exist and they are valid recs. "Anti-Rec: _____" clearly communicates this is something best avoided. But a better way format this type of Rec is to use a modifier or verb that flows with "I recommend _____." Ex. I recommend... Not Eating Tacks, Avoiding Area X, Leaving Off the Anchovies, etc.—(Formatting Anti-Recs this way first recommended by tyler the Creator) ANATOMY OF AN ASK: TITLE—This is the question or topic of the Ask. Asks can solicit advice or start a discussion. You have some flexibility here because the Ask is expected to be expounded upon in the body if it needs more context. Just be clear. Again, this is not a lead in. Be direct and ask the question or state the topic. BODY—Provide more context. Narrow the recommendation field. Add relevant links. Remember, the Ask goes in the Title 👆 EMOJI—No rules. Express yourself. ANSWERING AN ASK—Recs on Asks can break style as dictated by the Ask. If the Ask is looking for Recs, give Recs following style. If it's asking for opinions, give your opinion. Asking for links? Give links! Respond however you would respond some someone IRL. Asks start a conversation so you can be more conversational. But keep in mind that these Recs will appear in the main feed. So where you can maintain Rec style, do so. Example: WHAT’S YOUR CURRENT LETTERBOXD TOP 4? A response to this with High Rec Standards would look something like this: TITLE—Lists your current Letterboxd top 4. You are recommending these four movies. BODY—Free reign here. Drop your Letterboxd @. Talk about the movies. Make a quip. Emoji. Relevant links. Nothing. IMAGE—Optional. Screenshot of your top four. Frame from a movie. Dealer's choice. LINK—Add your Letterboxd profile only if you want to be found. EMOJI—Whatever. But it'd be nice if it was relevant. DISCLAIMER: This is a living community document! These are only my recommendations for a foundation. Debate and Discussion of proper style are Encouraged. Any editions and changes to the PI.FYI STYLE GUIDE will be notated with attribution. Changelog: 07.26.2024—Clarified a Rec is not limited to one recommendation. Recs can recommend multiple things. Thanks to shegoestoanotherschool for identifying the issue. / Added guidance for Anti-Rec format. 02.11.2025—Moved SpongeBob Bubble Blowing Technique video link from the top level into the body ("some pointers") so the embed wouldn't override the High Quality instructional graphic.
Jul 25, 2024
🐸
This combo has just been here the whole time?!
Feb 6, 2025
🥯
i will eat one every day i do not give a fuck anymore
Jan 30, 2024