🄣
An art installation and musical performance based on celestial movements that will, allegedly, take 1000 years to complete. It began in the year 2000.
recommendation image
Mar 7, 2025

Comments (0)

Make an account to reply.

No comments yet

Related Recs

šŸŽ¼
https://archive.org/details/BullOfHeaven?sort=-week Bull of Heaven is an experimental, avant-garde music group that was featured in a scholastic article entitled ā€œUnperformable Works and the Ontology of Musicā€ in the British Journal of Aesthetics, published by Oxford University Press in May 2016. From September 2009 to January of the following year, the band released a series of songs, known as Alephs. The first ten of these contained roughly 1000-1100 pieces in each sub-folder. Aleph10 and Aleph11 contain one million and ten million pieces respectively. In June 2010, the band created another new set of pieces different from the numbered, Aleph, and I-C pieces; this was a set of ten untitled folders, each containing thousands of short pieces, named as 32 digits of hexadecimal code. Between the end of 2010 and 2011, the band started creating various music puzzles, anti-music, and even lengthier pieces of music from where they started, which included anywhere from 900 hours to 2 months in duration. Examples include: MP3 files that are actually RAR archives, password-encrypted files, pieces embedded within other formats, such as PDF and EXE, pieces listed with negative song lengths, and a variety of SWF files. In March 2011, the band released a series of pieces of extraordinary lengths. This series, ranging from their numerical ordering of 238-260, is similar to the Longplayer idea - each sound is the length of a prime number, and each subsequent piece creates near infinite lengths of time before they’re synchronized. The final in the series, 260: cm (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47,53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79,83) would last 8,462,937,602, 125,701,219,674,955.2362595095 years before all the pieces synchronized. In 2012, they released only three pieces of music, including 289: CALCULOR, a calculator that doubles as a music generator. In early 2014, the band released a fan-made compilation of love songs,Ā 300: Songs for Girls, followed by 301: Weed Problem II-V, and another extremely lengthy piece, 302: It is Part of Spacd and Time, which runs for at least 86,370,000 years. 310: ΩΣPx0(2^18x5^18)p*k*k*k is their longest release, and lasts for 3.343 quindecillion years. Their entire discography is uploaded to the Internet Archive and mostly available on their website, though it’s frequently subjected to numerous 404 errors and downages. The band originally consisted of Clayton Counts and Neil Keener, but after Counts’ death, Keener remains the only member. On September 12, 2018, Neil released the first new Bull of Heaven piece since Clayton's death, titled "Fight Night for the Ghosts of Heaven".
Nov 21, 2023
recommendation image
šŸ’§
water & light-based installation that weaves light & sound through water. last night was a special event where lachlan explored how music from plants impact water & light. very cool piece
Nov 10, 2024

Top Recs from @lucius

recommendation image
āœļø
Alright y'all, standards have gotten a little lax around here and rec quality has taken a dip (I'm including myself in this). Here are some pointers for High Rec Standards. ANATOMY OF A REC: TITLE—This is the rec or recommendations. This is NOT a lead in. Type exactly what you're recommending here. What appears in the Title should finish this sentence, "I recommend _____." BODY—This supports the rec and anything goes. Supporting statements, supporting essays, additional recs, you can get silly, you can pontificate. You can do anything you want. Except putting the main rec down here. Where does it go? That's right. In the Title šŸ‘† IMAGE—No rules. Add one to preference. It can be relevant or a non sequitur. LINK—I highly recommend links but it's not as important as the Title or Body. If you are recommending something that has an online presence (music, movies, websites, products, etc.), Piffies want to click on it immediately. Don't make us google. Be kind a leave a link. EMOJI—No rules. Express yourself. ANTI-RECS: They exist and they are valid recs. "Anti-Rec: _____" clearly communicates this is something best avoided. But a better way format this type of Rec is to use a modifier or verb that flows with "I recommend _____." Ex. I recommend... Not Eating Tacks, Avoiding Area X, Leaving Off the Anchovies, etc.—(Formatting Anti-Recs this way first recommended by tyler the Creator) ANATOMY OF AN ASK: TITLE—This is the question or topic of the Ask. Asks can solicit advice or start a discussion. You have some flexibility here because the Ask is expected to be expounded upon in the body if it needs more context. Just be clear. Again, this is not a lead in. Be direct and ask the question or state the topic. BODY—Provide more context. Narrow the recommendation field. Add relevant links. Remember, the Ask goes in the Title šŸ‘† EMOJI—No rules. Express yourself. ANSWERING AN ASK—Recs on Asks can break style as dictated by the Ask. If the Ask is looking for Recs, give Recs following style. If it's asking for opinions, give your opinion. Asking for links? Give links! Respond however you would respond some someone IRL. Asks start a conversation so you can be more conversational. But keep in mind that these Recs will appear in the main feed. So where you can maintain Rec style, do so. Example: WHAT’S YOUR CURRENT LETTERBOXD TOP 4? A response to this with High Rec Standards would look something like this: TITLE—Lists your current Letterboxd top 4. You are recommending these four movies. BODY—Free reign here. Drop your Letterboxd @. Talk about the movies. Make a quip. Emoji. Relevant links. Nothing. IMAGE—Optional. Screenshot of your top four. Frame from a movie. Dealer's choice. LINK—Add your Letterboxd profile only if you want to be found. EMOJI—Whatever. But it'd be nice if it was relevant. DISCLAIMER: This is a living community document! These are only my recommendations for a foundation. Debate and Discussion of proper style are Encouraged. Any editions and changes to the PI.FYI STYLE GUIDE will be notated with attribution. Changelog: 07.26.2024—Clarified a Rec is not limited to one recommendation. Recs can recommend multiple things. Thanks to shegoestoanotherschool for identifying the issue. / Added guidance for Anti-Rec format. 02.11.2025—Moved SpongeBob Bubble Blowing Technique video link from the top level into the body ("some pointers") so the embed wouldn't override the High Quality instructional graphic.
Jul 25, 2024
🐸
This combo has just been here the whole time?!
Feb 6, 2025
🄯
i will eat one every day i do not give a fuck anymore
Jan 30, 2024