i literally had to stare at a wall and process how heartbreakingly fucked it was once it was over. chloë sevigny and ewen bremner give phenomenal performances though.
recommendation image
Dec 24, 2024

Comments (0)

Make an account to reply.

No comments yet

Related Recs

🎬
ever since I watched this two weeks ago I can’t stop thinking about it. it’s a stripper who just wants a baby but her boyfriend doesn’t want one so she convinces him by sleeping with his best friend. the things we do to get what we want… the loves we pass up in the blindness of misdirected desire… it‘s a silly little movie but it broke my heart too
Aug 12, 2024
🎞
Watched tonight, revelatory and uncomfortable and really excellent, well edited, really I can’t describe how well I loved it. If you liked Eternal Sunshine, Before Sunset, The Graduate, or (500) Days of Summer, you’ll love this— 2005 Helena Bonham Carter sharing the screen with a really dynamic sparring partner in Aaron Eckhart— it was so excellent.
Mar 16, 2024
riveting depiction of an anxious avoidant attachment between 2 teenage swedish lesbians like need i say more <3
Jan 22, 2024

Top Recs from @deardoveswings

🏘
liking ur rec = saying hi when we go to get our morning papers from the end of our driveways (picture me doing so tony soprano style)
Aug 12, 2024
💌
she can’t see my bank account so it’s ok.
Mar 21, 2025
🚫
started writing this a few hours ago when i first saw this ask, then decided against posting but i've since changed my mind. there really is no justification for it outside of entitlement. even from a selfish lens, there's no long term benefit to its usage. it harms the world and culture in more ways than one. a.) the water and energy usage that isn't a secret at this point. "no ethical consumption under capitalism" yadda yadda and yeah corporations are extremely culpable in the state of the environment but there really is no need for chatgpt and the planet is already too delicate at the moment. b.) the exploitation of workers in the global south. this program is not just a computer figuring it all out, there are in fact humans behind it. it reminds me of the acceptance of fast fashion and how people have the tendency to divorce the idea of the garment worker from the garment they wear when all clothing is handmade in some way, shape or form. you need hands to man a sewing machine, you need human eyes to moderate content. also, content moderation can be a thankless job with psychological repercussions. c.) the erosion of social skills, humanity and media literacy...this one is very personal. like, you have a cushy email job but can't write an email? you need a computer and a worker in kenya to get paid a dollar an hour to figure out a daily routine for you? i've seen the program churn out blatantly incorrect information. fine tuning a prompt or chat or whatever to give you the exact (possibly incorrect) answer you need isn't really that much less work than sharpening your research skills by cracking open a dictionary or using boolean search keys in google. again, the main issue with this kind of stuff is the entitlement to convenience, with no thought towards the repercussions within and outside of us. we are losing major recipes (critical thinking and media literacy) here, people! i probably did an iffy job are coherently articulating my thoughts here but i am in fact, human. and that’s the beauty of it all.
Oct 1, 2024