recently watched āWarfareā directed by Mendoza and Garland. first hearing abt it, i had a similarly appalled reaction to most people on film-social media; not to mention, iām already not the biggest A24 fan, though i groove w a lot of their splish. i decided i wanted to come to my own conclusion, here it is!!!: idrk. it obviously aims to do no more than portray exactly what mendoza remembers, but every story lives in context. it feels cheap, in a sense, to simply say that you can only speak purely based on what youāve seen. it kinda lobs the civilian perspective every once-in-a-while, and iām sure the directors actually want the audience to question the actions of the soldiers. im on the fence, cuz thereās obviously enough to come to your own conclusion, but does the movie have the complexity and forethought to deserve credit for the audienceās ponderings? needa learn more. thoughts?