in full:
📊🙌😩 Bald Eagle Bullies [EXONERATED] - ReGenerator: Kiss of Life 😘🌱 (🌜🌖🌝 CHESTER TO THE MOON[🇺🇸 for real ⚠️ NOT FAKE ⚠️ — trust us 😉🇺🇸] 🌔🌛🌚 ) 😩🙌📊 ((FIRMLY😤😤 on land, protected by U.S. Constitution Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) ❌ DO NOT TRESPASS ❌), UNESCO World Heritage Site™️)
Explanations:
Bald Eagle Bullies - The original name of the chat, which has been continually added onto and amended as more events and in-jokes within the group come up. The name came from when my friends and I got citations in a state park for trespassing in a "protected bald eagle sanctuary," which legally we were but in practicality the whole thing is a farce and no eagles were ever or could ever have been put in danger.
[EXONERATED] - re: bald eagle endangerment allegations: we beat the case
ReGenerator - Kiss of Life - we all took this personality test (that I found on here actually) and 3/4 of us got Generator - Life Force as our types, which was the original form of this section. when we did poorly in a group project we were all in, this then became DeGenerator - Death Force, and when our group did well later, we changed it to what it is now.
CHESTER TO THE MOON - the group project we're in is a simulation where our group is a company competing with companies of other classmates, our company is called Chester. early enthusiasm in our capability as a group led us to add this as-is, but after Q1 in the sim our stock tanked to the worst in the class and we changed it to CHESTER AT ROCK BOTTOM and changed the emojis around it to reflect our horrible stock value (CCC for those who know). we've since recovered and returned to TO THE MOON
[🇺🇸 for real ⚠️ NOT FAKE ⚠️ — trust us 😉🇺🇸] - we once had a long, spirited debate about the veracity of the first moon landing. this is a reference to that and also our stock price being to the moon.
((FIRMLY😤😤 on land, protected by U.S. Constitution Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) ❌ DO NOT TRESPASS ❌), UNESCO World Heritage Site™️) - for some reason (underwater) was a big meme in our friend group for a bit. i remember the reason being HILARIOUS to me at the time, have since forgotten the reason. when our group's stock price went under we added (underwater) but now our stock is SOARING to a B rating and we are FIRMLY on land. the constitutional protection is the US Bald Eagle Protection Act, which the state park cited as their reason that we were not allowed off trail, and we should not trespass because we know what happened last time. UNESCO World Heritage Site was added later to make fun of how overkill the original state park trespass rule was and is just a hyperbolic take on it.
the funniest part about all this is that whenever siri reads the name when giving notifications in the car or when i have earbuds in she reads the names of ALL the emojis IN FULL. it takes like 2+ min to even get to the part where she reads the text and asks if you want to respond.
Mar 31, 2024
Related Recs
Apr 16, 2024
😃
one of my coworkers calls their chatgpt “gizmo”. cannot roll my eyes fast enough.
May 3, 2025
self-explanatory!
☞ silly
☞ useful
☞ delightful
BONKUS OF THE KONKUS
Feb 8, 2025
Top Recs from @royallmonarch
6d ago
📴
I consume a lot of music regularly, and a huge part of keeping a fresh diet of new listens going is having enough sources of recommendations that aren’t an algorithm that either 1) reinforces your existing listening patterns, keeping you stagnant in your tastes, or 2) platforms whoever paid enough to push their product to the top, serving you something that may not inherently be of inferior quality, but may not align with your tastes, may not be exciting beyond just being a new release, and realigns your current listening habits to be more in line with what the average user on the platform is also listening to — which socially might have benefits but which creates a homogeneity of consumption that can become bland since you’re listening to something really just because it’s the next product on the assembly line to have its public moment and not because anything about the music actually captured your attention. the current landscape of streaming is designed to keep you at an all you can eat buffet where you take what’s served to you, and as a result a lot of us have forgotten how to look at a menu and order.
so what does taking a more active role in your own music curation look like? for me, it’s meant not using streaming as a primary listening platform. I mostly use my local Apple Music library on my phone that I curate with the vestigial iTunes Library framework that’s still a part of Apple Music on my laptop. probably going to find an alternative soon since apple seems to be cutting integration progressively. I like this method because it forces me to choose what to sync to the limited storage space I have, forcing me to take inventory of what I actually listen to and what I can offload. the files I get are mostly from Bandcamp or Soulseek depending on whether it’s available for purchase or entirely unavailable online (as is the case for a lot of electronic music that was on vinyl only, which is where soulseek comes in clutch). I also have freedom here to change the ID3 tags to better sort and organize, rate, change track info, and track my own listening data.
Bandcamp and other music purchasing platforms are great because 1) it reshapes my relationship to music away from consumerism and back towards curation. I have to pay actual money for this thing now if I want to use it, so i’m forced to consider its value (usually i’ll stream a release first to gauge my interest). 2) having to spend money helps me to course out my meals so to speak, as i’ll buy a few releases i’ve accumulated in my cart over the month and cash out on Bandcamp Friday when 100% of my money is actually getting to the artist (TOMORROW IS BANDCAMP FRIDAY BTW!!!), and between purchases I can actually chew and savor and digest my last orders, they don’t get swept up in the deluge of new releases. my plate is full until i’m done and then I order more. also for the times of the year like now when new music isn’t coming out as regularly I take time to find older music that I would normally overlook while keeping up with new drops. currently very into early 80s/late 70s music with early digital production, kinda stuff that would evolve into synthpop and dance music.
so how do you know what to order? for me, I’m getting recs through trusted curation platforms. whether it’s bandcamp daily, y’all lovely folks here on PI.FYI, friends, or most importantly musicians who I follow on socials that share their tastes through posts, stories, playlists on steaming, interviews, etc. I like this last one especially because it’s kind of like a musical game of telephone. if I like an artist and they share their interests and influences it’s like every layer in this process is stretching my palate further from the sound that I was originally interested in and into a new territory that has some shared DNA but would never have been recommended to me by an algo because there’s no shared category or label between them, only the musical influence and interpretation of it made by the artist. as an example, I was a huge Skrillex stan, he signed KOAN Sound to his label, they collab with Asa who collabs with Sorrow, Sorrow takes huge influence from Burial, Burial makes some ambient adjacent stuff and takes huge influence from 90s rave music and drum and bass and 2000s rnb, now i’m listening to Brandy - All in Me, William Basinski, Aphex Twin, none on whom would get recommended by Spotify to me from Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites.
LAST thing i’ll say — because in yappin about this i’m realizing how actually passionate about this subject I am: MAKE LISTS! playlists are cool, but they can flatten your music into vague categories of “vibes” and “aesthetics” and encourage picking one-off songs from artists that you never form an active audience relationship with. I make a practice of making my own year end lists of top 25 albums (plus some honorable recs and top individual songs) and keeping them in a notes doc that I regularly update and rearrange over the course of the year. this forces me to consider the actual relationship i’m forming with what i’ve ordered for myself. did I like it in the moment but it didn’t have staying power? is it slowly growing on me? it also encourages taking albums as a whole. maybe I liked one or two tracks a lot but the rest wasn't resonating. that’s ok! maybe I rank it lower but now i’ve actually taken time to consider it, it’s in my library, and maybe (quite a few cases for me) something I ranked like bottom 5 albums becomes a retroactive favorite from that year as my tastes evolve. also 25 albums to take with me from each year is really more than you'd think, i struggle sometimes to even find 25 that I formed a true connection with. I think the biggest thing the itunes era ruined that led into now is the single-ification of music, the ability to separate the hits from the deep cuts. albums are meant to be taken as a whole, and then once you've really sat with the whole you can find what actually stuck. even then I like to keep the whole around because soooo often i’ll write off a track that yeeeears later I come to love. trust the artist, they made it like they did for a reason.
aaannyyyywayy TLDR: get recs organically, be more active in deciding your listening patterns, fr*cken pay artists yall, trust the artist embrace the album, really consider what you consume
Feb 29, 2024
4d ago